midpage

Frey v. FrancisFrey v. Francis

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 29, 1984
No. 83-6919; No. 83-6946; No. 84-5045; No. 84-5170; No. 84-5175; No. 84-5180; No. 84-5205; No. 84-5298; No. 84-5334; No. 84-5349; No. 84-5351
Versions:469 U.S. 963
105 S. Ct. 363

Lead Opinion

Sup. Ct. Pa.;

Sup. Ct. Pa.;

C. A. 11th Cir.;

Sup. Ct. Ill.;

Sup. Ct. Ill.;

Sup. Ct. Ark.;

Sup. Ct. Ill.;

Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;

Sup. Ct. N. C.;

Ct. Crim. App. Tenn.; and

Sup. Ct. Ky. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 83-6919, 504 Pa. 428, 475 A. 2d 700; No. 83-6946, 504 Pa. 455, 475 A. 2d 714; No. 84-5045, 728 F. 2d 1322; No. 84-5170, 102 Ill. 2d 145, 464 N. E. 2d 252; No. 84-5175, 102 Ill. 2d 88, 464 N. E. 2d 261; No. 84-5180, 282 *964Ark. 304, 669 S. W. 2d 186; No. 84-5205, 102 Ill. 2d 23, 464 N. E. 2d 223; No. 84-5298, 667 S. W. 2d 720; No. 84-5334, 311 N. C. 1, 316 S. E. 2d 197; No. 84-5351, 671 S. W. 2d 241.






Dissenting Opinion

Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.

Case Details

Case Name: Frey v. Francis
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Oct 29, 1984
Citations: 469 U.S. 963; 105 S. Ct. 363; No. 83-6919; No. 83-6946; No. 84-5045; No. 84-5170; No. 84-5175; No. 84-5180; No. 84-5205; No. 84-5298; No. 84-5334; No. 84-5349; No. 84-5351
Docket Number: No. 83-6919; No. 83-6946; No. 84-5045; No. 84-5170; No. 84-5175; No. 84-5180; No. 84-5205; No. 84-5298; No. 84-5334; No. 84-5349; No. 84-5351
Court Abbreviation: U.S.
Log In