Frey v. Francis, 469 U.S. 963

Frey v. Francis

469 U.S. 963

SCOTUS

1984

Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Sup. Ct. Pa.;

C. A. 11th Cir.;

Sup. Ct. Ill.;

Sup. Ct. Ark.;

Sup. Ct. Ill.;

Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;

Sup. Ct. N. C.;

Ct. Crim. App. Tenn.; and

Sup. Ct. Ky. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 83-6919, 504 Pa. 428, 475 A. 2d 700; No. 83-6946, 504 Pa. 455, 475 A. 2d 714; No. 84-5045, 728 F. 2d 1322; No. 84-5170, 102 Ill. 2d 145, 464 N. E. 2d 252; No. 84-5175, 102 Ill. 2d 88, 464 N. E. 2d 261; No. 84-5180, 282 *964Ark. 304, 669 S. W. 2d 186; No. 84-5205, 102 Ill. 2d 23, 464 N. E. 2d 223; No. 84-5298, 667 S. W. 2d 720; No. 84-5334, 311 N. C. 1, 316 S. E. 2d 197; No. 84-5351, 671 S. W. 2d 241.

Dissenting Opinion

Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.