Freund v. Hogan
190 N.E. 348 | NY | 1934
The question is whether the City Judge of Long Beach is a city officer, so that the council of such city may increase his compensation under the City Home Rule Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 76), or a State officer (Whitmore v. Mayor,
The question has been answered to the effect that, so far as compensation is concerned, he is a city officer. (People ex rel.Garrity v. Walsh,
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ., concur; KELLOGG, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed. *205