History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fretwell v. State
503 So. 2d 1000
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1987
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant's conviction but vacate his sentence and remand for a new sentencing hearing. We believe the trial court erred in assessing points against appellant with reference to his prior failure to appear for a hearing in traffic court, and also for assessing points for previous un-counseled convictions without determining whether counsel had been properly waived in those cases. See Pilla v. State, 477 So.2d 1088 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

ANSTEAD, LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Fretwell v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 18, 1987
Citation: 503 So. 2d 1000
Docket Number: No. 85-2350
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.