184 Pa. 161 | Pa. | 1898
Opinion by
The subjects of complaint in this appeal are certain surcharges against the appellant, Armand C. Hess, receiver of the defendant company, made by the learned auditor and approved by the court below.
It is proper to' say, in limine, that appellant was not surcharged for any loss arising from mere error of judgment. Ex
As to the allowance claimed by appellant for bicycles included in the inventory, but which ho alleged were left for repairs only and did not belong to the assignor company, the auditor rightly held that the claim for allowance was not substantiated. The clerks by whom the inventory and appraisement were made were not called to testify, although they were in the city at the time of the hearing. In view of all the circumstances disclosed by the evidence, the credit claimed was properly disallowed.
The credit claimed for payment on the Williams lease was also properly disallowed. The order of court authorizing the sale of the leasehold required the purchaser “to assume the ground
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.