Freihofner v. FreihofnerFreihofner v. Freihofner
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff failed to make a sufficient showing to vacate the stipulatiоn of discontinuance based on unilateral mistake (see Matter of Frutiger, 29 NY2d 143, 150; G&S Clam Bar v Melillo, 302 AD2d 492 [2003]; Karapetyan v Underwood, 287 AD2d 547 [2001]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff’s motion. Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.