10 La. Ann. 660 | La. | 1855
This is a suit in which a married woman, who is separated in property from her husband, seeks to enjoin a seizure made by a judgment creditor of her husband.
The plaintiff, in 1838, obtained a judgment of separation of property, as above stated, in which, a certain number of cows and horses, designated by the brand E. T., were recognized as her paraphernal property. In the petition filed by her, she prayed that her husband might be enjoined from selling or otherwise disposing of the property thus claimed by her. The defendants rely upon the alleged nullity of the judgment of separation, and of all the proceedings incident thereto.
The view we have taken of the facts of this case, makes it unnecessary to examine the issues which have been made with reference to the validity of the
Under the evidence, we think that the stock seized in execution by the defendants, must be recognized as the paraphernal property of the wife, subject to her separate administration.
It is ordered that the judgment appealed from be affirmed with costs.