| N.J. | Feb 2, 1922

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For afjirmcMice — Trie Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trencbiard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Katzenbaci-i, White, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.