Fredricks v. StateFredricks v. State
MILLS, Judge.
Fredricks contends the trial court erred in retaining jurisdiction for the first half of four sentences pursuant to
Ex post facto application of the retention statute is not fundamental error and objection must be made at the trial level to preserve the issue for appellate review. Williams v. State, 414 So.2d 509 (Fla. 1982); Brown v. State, 428 So.2d 369 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).
AFFIRMED.
SHIVERS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.