History
  • No items yet
midpage
Frederickson v. State
585 So. 2d 506
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1991
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Annette Frederickson challenges the trial court’s judgment and sentence for violating the terms of her probation for fourteen separate worthless check charges under Section 832.05(4)(a), Florida Statutes. We affirm on all issues raised since there is no apparent prejudice to the appellant.

However, in light of the obvious conflict which exists between the terms of the oral and written sentences, we note that several scrivener’s errors are apparent in the written sentences. Therefore, we hold that the trial court’s oral pronouncement of sentence, in which the appellant was sentenced to five consecutive five-year sentences, with nine sentences to run concurrently to sentence 89-966, is the proper sentence of record. We remand to the trial court to enter an amended written sentence conforming to the oral pronouncement.

AFFIRMED.

SHIVERS and WOLF, JJ., and CAWTHON, Senior Judge, concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Frederickson v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Sep 18, 1991
Citation: 585 So. 2d 506
Docket Number: No. 90-3678
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.