207 N.W. 499 | Minn. | 1926
There is really nothing to review. Relator cannot complain because his case was not tried de novo. The rehearing on the merits, ordered by our first decision, did not require the commission to hear anew the old evidence. Under the statute (section 4315, G.S. 1923), it had a discretion with respect to the new evidence to be received. Relator never properly invoked an exercise of that discretion, as he might have done and was given the opportunity to do, by a proper application to the commission.
Writ quashed. *214