History
  • No items yet
midpage
Frazier v. Venen
3 Wash. Terr. 392
Wash. Terr.
1888
Check Treatment
Mr. Justice Turner

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellees move to dismiss the appeal in the above cases, because appellant has failed to file or serve an assignment of errors.

We are of opinion that the motion must prevail. There is nothing in the complaint or answer to make the case one of equitable cognizance. The orders and judgments of the District Court, in actions at law, cannot be reviewed in this court without an assignment of errors. (Brown et al. v. Hazard, 2 Wash. 464.)

Let the appeal be dismissed.

Jones, C. J., Allyn J., and Langford, J,, concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Frazier v. Venen
Court Name: Washington Territory
Date Published: Jan 25, 1888
Citation: 3 Wash. Terr. 392
Court Abbreviation: Wash. Terr.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.