midpage

Fraternal Order of Police v. City of MiamiFraternal Order of Police v. City of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Jun 18, 2014
No. 3D13-2437
Versions:
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. Dep’t of Revenue v. City of Gainesville, 918 So.2d 250, 256 (Fla.2005) (“[A] determination that a statute is facially unconstitutional means that no set of circumstances exists under which the statute would be valid.”); Headley v. City of Miami, 118 So.3d 885 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (holding that the City of Miami did not commit unfair labor practices by unilaterally modifying the collective bargaining agreement pursuant to section 447.4095 of the Florida Statutes); see also Hollywood Fire Fighters, Local 1375, IAFF, Inc. v. City of Hollywood, 133 So.3d 1042 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (holding implicitly in an as applied challenge that the use of the term “financial urgency” in section 447.4095 is not unconstitutionally vague; certifying conflict on other grounds with Headley).

Case Details

Case Name: Fraternal Order of Police v. City of Miami
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jun 18, 2014
Citations: 143 So. 3d 953; 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9220; 2014 WL 2753871; No. 3D13-2437
Docket Number: No. 3D13-2437
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In