midpage

Frappied v. StateFrappied v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
May 1, 1964
No. 4481
Versions:163 So. 2d 502
1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4197
PER CURIAM.

The order here appealed, denying appellant’s claim for relief under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, must be reversed and the causé remanded for consideration in light of this court’s decision and opinion in Caminita v. State, Fla.App.1964, 159 So.2d 921, filed some months after entry of the order in this cause.

The text of the appealed order and the scant record in this court intimate that appellant may, in fact, not be in custody under a sentence of the lower court. If, after the hearing necessary upon remand of the cause, this should be shown to be true, relief under Rule No. 1 in the court below would not be available.

Reversed and remanded.

ALLEN, Acting C. J., and SHANNON and WHITE, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Frappied v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 1, 1964
Citations: 163 So. 2d 502; 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4197; No. 4481
Docket Number: No. 4481
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In