midpage

Franz v. N. O. Coffee Co.Franz v. N. O. Coffee Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jun 18, 1928
No. 10,179
Versions:8 La. App. 445
1928 La. App. LEXIS 134
WESTERFIELD, J.

Plaintiff sued for $470.36 as damages alleged to be due him as a result of a collision between his automobile and one belonging to defendant.

The examination of the first witness placed upon the stand by plaintiff disclosed the fact that plaintiff had been paid all of his alleged damages except $99.00 by an insurance company, whereupon the judge maintained an exception of no 'cause of action as to the amount paid and dismissed the suit for the remaining $99.00, because of the lack of jurisdiction.

The judgment appealed from is clearly erroneous.

Hanton, et al., vs. New Orleans and Carrollton R. L. and P. Company, 124 La. 562, 50 So. 544; Griffith vs. Keller, 147 La. 540, 85 So. 233; Smith vs. Richland Compress & Warehouse Company, 153 La. 820, 96 So. 668; First National Bank of Miami vs. Jefferson Construction Company, 162 La. 47, 110 So. 84; Hennican vs. Woodman, 1 La. App. 281; Hendren vs. Crescent City S. & M. Water Company, 1 La. App. 625.

The judgment appealed from is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings according to law and the views herein expressed.

Case Details

Case Name: Franz v. N. O. Coffee Co.
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Jun 18, 1928
Citations: 8 La. App. 445; 1928 La. App. LEXIS 134; No. 10,179
Docket Number: No. 10,179
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
Log In