65 So. 857 | Ala. Ct. App. | 1914
The appellant was indicted for murder in the first degree, and this appeal is from an order
Section 16 of the Constitution, governing the admission to bail under the circumstances mentioned, has frequently been the subject of consideration and construction by our Supreme Court. The constitutional provision cited declares:
“That all persons shall, before conviction, be bailable by sufficient sureties, except for capital offenses, when the proof is evident or the presumption great.”
And our Supreme Court has held that the “proof is not evident and the presumption is not great” where from the evidence adduced a well-founded doubt exists as to murder in the first degree (Ex parte Bryant, 34 Ala. 270; Ex parte Hammock, 78 Ala. 414); or where, upon such evidence, the court would not sustain a verdict of conviction of murder in the highest degree (Ex parte Sloane, 95 Ala. 22, 11 South. 14, and citations under section 16 of the Constitution).
Our jurisdiction in this instance is appellate only, and our consideration is therefore confined to the evidence that was before the lower court on the trial of the writ of habeas corpus. — Code, § 6245. We do not deem it wise to discuss this evidence for fear such discussion might prejudice the state’s case on the regular trial of the defendant on the charge,. when and where the evidence may, in material particulars, be stronger for the state than here. We need only say that on the evidence before us and under the authorities cited below we are of opinion that the appellant is entitled to bail. —De Arman v. State, 71 Ala. 351; Naugher v. State, 105 Ala. 26, 17 South. 24; Ex parte King, 86 Ala. 620, 5 South. 863; Hornsby v. State, 94 Ala. 65, 10 South. 522, and authorities supra.
Reversed and remanded.
