midpage

Franklin v. StateFranklin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Dec 16, 1986
No. BK-300
Versions:498 So. 2d 1035
11 Fla. L. Weekly 2628
1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11393
PER CURIAM.

Notwithstanding this court’s prior remand of this case with instructions to the trial court to resentence the appellant in conformity with the provisions of § 39.-111(6), Fla.Stat. (1983), see, Franklin v. State, 476 So.2d 1346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), we find the case again before us on a record which does not include a written statement of reasons justifying imposition of adult sanctions as is required by § 39.-111(6)(d). Accordingly, we again reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

JOANOS, THOMPSON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Franklin v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Dec 16, 1986
Citations: 498 So. 2d 1035; 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2628; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11393; No. BK-300
Docket Number: No. BK-300
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In