Franklin v. StateFranklin v. State
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Law
OPINION
W. KENNETH LAW, Chief Justice.
Gary Franklin was placed on deferred adjudication supervision after he pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting a child. Franklin has now been adjudicated guilty and he seeks to appeal. The trial court
*808
has certified that this is a plea bargain case and Franklin has no right of appeal.
See
A defendant who plea bargains for deferred adjudication has a right to appeal, following a subsequent adjudication, issues unrelated to the conviction but no right to appeal issues related to the conviction. Woods
v. State,
68 S.W.3d 667, 669 (Tex.Crim.App.2002);
Kirtley v. State,
56 S.W.3d 48, 51 (Tex.Crim.App.2001);
Vidaurri v. State,
49 S.W.3d 880, 884-85 (Tex.Crim.App.2001). The form promulgated by the court of criminal appeals to certify the defendant’s right of appeal does not provide for this conditional right of appeal.
See
Tex.R.App. P. appendix (found at
The trial court’s certification that Franklin has no right of appeal is incorrect and therefore defective.
See Dears v. State,
154 S.W.3d 610, 614 (Tex.Crim.App.2005) (inaccurate certification is defective). We abate the appeal for ten days and instruct the trial court to prepare and send to this Court an amended certification that accurately reflects Franklin’s conditional right of appeal.
The appeal is abated.