History
  • No items yet
midpage
Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. Huntington
274 Pa. 205
Pa.
1922
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

In this case the court below entered judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, in an action founded on certain sales memoranda of the same character as that quoted in our opinion in Franklin Sugar Refining Company v. Howell, filed herewith [the preceding case]. The questions raised and decided there are controlling here also, and hence the same judgment must be entered.

The judgment of the court below is reversed and a procedendo is awarded.

Case Details

Case Name: Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. Huntington
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 8, 1922
Citation: 274 Pa. 205
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 259
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.