midpage

Frankel v. New York City Transit AuthorityFrankel v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 3, 2015
16284 152230/13
Versions:134 A.D.3d 440
19 N.Y.S.3d 739

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), rendered February 23, 2012, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. Although defendant was in custody and had not yet received Miranda warnings, his inquiry about why he was being charged with a felony was “immediately met by a brief and relatively innocuous answer by the police officer,” not constituting interrogation or its functional equivalent (People v Rivers, 56 NY2d 476, 480 [1982]; compare People v Lanahan, 55 NY2d 711 [1981] [detailed recital of evidence held equivalent to interrogation]). Under these circumstances, defendant’s inculpatory statement was self-generated and spontaneous. Concur —Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Andrias and Gische, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Frankel v. New York City Transit Authority
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 3, 2015
Citations: 134 A.D.3d 440; 19 N.Y.S.3d 739; 16284 152230/13
Docket Number: 16284 152230/13
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In