History
  • No items yet
midpage
Frankel v. Frankel
268 A.D. 752
N.Y. App. Div.
1944
Check Treatment

Order insofar as it modifies the final decree unanimously reversed and the issues raised by the conflicting affidavits referred to an official referee for the purpose of talcing proof and reporting to Special Term. That provision of the order appealed from which denies-the plaintiff’s cross motion “to have defendant declared in contempt of court ” is unanimously affirmed with leave to renew after the filing of the report of the official referee. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Frankel v. Frankel
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 2, 1944
Citation: 268 A.D. 752
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.