Frank M. Weaver Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

15 Pa. Commw. 292 | Pa. Commw. Ct. | 1974

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

This is an appeal by the Frank M. Weaver Company and its insurance carrier, Travelers Insurance Company (appellants), from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a referee’s award of benefits pursuant to a fatal claim petition filed by Stella Puskoskie.

Stella PuskosMe alleged that she was entitled to benefits as the surviving widow of Albert PuskosMe under the appropriate provisions of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act.¹

It is undisputed that Albert PuskosMe suffered an accident wMle in the course of Ms employment on September 2, 1970, and that he died on October 23, 1970. The sole issue presented by tMs appeal is whether or not Albert PuskosMe’s accident on September 2, 1970, caused Ms death.

Our scope of review in workmen’s compensation cases in wMch the claimant has prevailed below is limited to a determination of whether constitutional rights were violated, an error of law was committed, or any necessary finding of fact was not supported by substantial evidence. Regent Bottling Company v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 10 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 8, 309 A. 2d 265 (1973). Appellants contend that the referee’s finding of causation between the accident and Puskoskie’s death is not supported by substantial evidence. We do not agree.

The referee’s finding in regard to causation is as follows : “4. On September 2, 1970, the decedent sustained an injury to Ms chest as well as Ms face. He had a blunt trauma of the chest wall with lung contusion. The decedent after the accident had difficulty breathing, had chest pain, had oxygen admimstered to him, was sluggish and rundown and had difficulty breathing wMle lying down. The chest trauma precipitated infection, or pneumonitis, wMch caused Ms death.”

Our careful review of the record reveals that this finding is adequately supported by evidence in the record; most notably, the testimony of claimant’s medical expert, Hr. AntoMo J. L. Simoes.

It is true that appellants presented the testimony of their medical expert, Dr. James Dominic Cozzarelli, to the effect that Puskoskie’s death was not caused by his accident. The conflict in medical testimony was resolved by the referee in favor of the claimant. As it is the province of the fact finder to weigh conflicting testimony and accept that which he finds most reliable, we cannot substitute our determination for that of the referee. Rosenau Brothers, Inc. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 10 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 462, 311 A. 2d 160 (1973).

In conclusion, we find that the record contains substantial competent evidence to support the referee’s finding that Albert Puskoskie’s death was caused by his accident at work on September 2, 1970.

We, therefore, issue the following

Order

And Now, this 30th day of September, 1974, the affirmance by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board of the referee’s order relative to the claim of Stella Puskoskie is hereby affirmed. Accordingly, it is ordered that judgment be entered in favor of Stella Puskoskie and against Frank M. Weaver Company and the Travelers Insurance Company in the amount of $39 per week beginning October 23, 1970, and continuing for an indefinite period, and for the sum of $750 on account of the decedent’s burial expenses, together with interest at the rate of 6 percent per annum on deferred installments from the date due to the date paid, all within the terms and limits of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act.

1 Act of June 2,1915, P. h. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §1 et seq.