Frank Buttermark Plumbing & Heating Corp. v. SagareseFrank Buttermark Plumbing & Heating Corp. v. Sagarese
— In an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on certain real property, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Felig, J.), dated June 24, 1985, which, inter alia, denied their motion to set aside a foreclosure sale.
Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendants contend that the foreclosure sale should have been set aside on the grounds of improper notice and inadequacy of the sale price. Both contentions are without merit.
Since the adjournment of the foreclosure sale was for a period not exceeding four weeks, a single publication of the postponed date sufficed as adequate notice of the foreclosure sale, regardless of the fact the sale was adjourned for a reason other than the failure of the Referee appointed to conduct the sale to appear (see, Guardian Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. v Horse-Hawk Holding Corp.,