Francoline v. Klatt

221 Conn. 913 | Conn. | 1992

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 26 Conn. App. 203, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court’s judgment that the defendant had not proven a valid claim under General Statutes §§ 42-110a through 42-110g, the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act?”

Decided February 14, 1992 Ann M. Siczewicz, in support of the petition. Robert J. Reeve, in opposition.

Case Details

Case Name: Francoline v. Klatt

Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date Published: Feb 14, 1992

Citation: 221 Conn. 913

Court Abbreviation: Conn.