Francoline v. Klatt
221 Conn. 913
Conn.
1992
Check Treatment

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 26 Conn. App. 203, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court’s judgment that the defendant had not proven *914a valid claim under General Statutes §§ 42-110a through 42-110g, the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act?”

Decided February 14, 1992 Ann M. Siczewicz, in support of the petition. Robert J. Reeve, in opposition.