History
  • No items yet
midpage
Francis v. State
805 S.W.2d 474
Tex. Crim. App.
1991
Check Treatment

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted appellant of murder and assessed punishment at confinement for life plus a fine of $10,000. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Francis v. State, 801 S.W.2d 548, (Tex.App.—Houston [14th], 1990).

Appellant raises four grounds for review. After careful review we refuse appellant’s petition for review. However, as is true in every case in which discretionary review is refused, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 *475(Tex.Cr.App.1983). With this understanding, we refuse appellant’s petition for discretionary review.

Case Details

Case Name: Francis v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Mar 13, 1991
Citation: 805 S.W.2d 474
Docket Number: No. 099-91
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.