midpage

Fraim v. StateFraim v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Aug 30, 1996
No. 95-2450
Versions:678 So. 2d 527
1996 WL 492176
1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9116
W. SHARP, Judge.

We affirm Fraim’s conviction and sentence for failure to appear in violation of section 812.014(1) and (2)(c). However, pursuant to Andrews v. State, 660 So.2d 394 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995), we strike the $250.00 public defender hen assessed against him because it was imposed without notice or opportunity to contest the amount. The trial court did orally announce the public defender’s hen, which is part of the “charges and costs fees” portion of the standard forms for judgment and sentence. On remand, the trial court may reimpose the lien after giving Fraim due notice, and affording him an opportunity to oppose it. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.720(d)(1).

AFFIRMED, LIEN STRICKEN, REMANDED.

GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Fraim v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Aug 30, 1996
Citations: 678 So. 2d 527; 1996 WL 492176; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9116; No. 95-2450
Docket Number: No. 95-2450
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In