FPL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES, Pеtitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Docket No. 5271-96
UNITED STATES TAX COURT
Filed February 1, 2001
116 T.C. No. 7
On its consolidated Federal income tax returns for the years in issue, F claimed a credit for Federal taxes on fuels. F now seeks credits in addition to amounts claimed on F‘s original Federal income tax returns. R argues that the so-called “one claim” rule contained in
Held: F is not barred by the so-called “one claim” rule of
Robert Thomas Carney, for petitioner.
James F. Kearney, for respondent.
OPINION
RUWE, Judge: This matter is before the Court on respondent‘s motion for partial summary judgment filed pursuant to Rule 121.1 The sole issue presented is whether petitioner is barred by the so-called “one claim” rule of
Background
FPL Group, Inc., is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida with its principal office located in Juno Beach, Florida. FPL Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries (petitioner) filed consolidated Federal income tax returns for the years 1988 through 1992. Petitioner attached to each return a Form 4136, Computation of Credit for Federal Tax on Fuels. Form 4136 is used to claim credit for Federal excise tax paid on fuels sold or used during the period
| Year | Credit |
|---|---|
| 1988 | $279,732 |
| 1989 | 233,053 |
| 1990 | 275,303 |
| 1991 | 391,516 |
| 1992 | 332,568 |
In its second amended petition, petitioner alleged that respondent erred in failing to allow additional fuel tax credits for vehicles which are not “highway use” vehicles in the following amounts:
| Year | Credit |
|---|---|
| 1988 | $135,194 |
| 1989 | 136,840 |
| 1990 | 143,340 |
| 1991 | 202,096 |
| 1992 | 215,649 |
These amоunts are in addition to the amounts claimed as credits on petitioner‘s original Federal income tax returns for those years.
Discussion
I. Summary Judgment
Summary judgment is intended to expedite litigation and avoid unnecessary and expensive triаls. See Northern Ind. Pub. Serv. Co. v. Commissioner, 101 T.C. 294, 295 (1993); Shiosaki v. Commissioner, 61 T.C. 861, 862 (1974). Rule 121(a) provides that either party may move for summary judgment upon all or any part of the legal issues in controversy. Full or partial summary judgment is appropriate where there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and a decision may be rendered as a matter of law. See Rule 121(b); Sundstrand Corp. v. Commissioner, 98 T.C. 518, 520 (1992), affd. 17 F.3d 965 (7th Cir. 1994). Respondent, as the moving party, bears the burden of proving that no genuine issue exists as to any material fact and that he is еntitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Bond v. Commissioner, 100 T.C. 32, 36 (1993); Naftel v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 527, 529 (1985). In deciding whether to grant summary judgment, the factual materials and the inferences drawn from them must be considered in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. See Bond v. Commissioner, supra at 36; Naftel v. Commissioner, supra at 529. In the instant case, there is no genuine issue as to any of the material facts that we have set forth in the background section of this opinion.
II. Sections 6427 and 34
Respondent argues that petitioner is making a second claim under
A. Section 6427
Section 6427 provides a mechanism whereby a purchaser of fuel can obtain payment from the Secretary of taxes previously imposed on fuel which was not used for taxable purposes by the purchaser. See
Limitations on filing a claim for payment under section 6427 are addressed in section 6427(i). The general rule of limitation for payment of claims filed under section 6427 is that not more than one claim may be filed by any person
SEC. 6427(i). Time for Filing Claims; Period Covered.--
(1) General rule.--Except as provided in paragraphs (2),(3), and (4), not more than one claim may be filed under subsection (a),(b),(d), [e in 1988 and 1989],(g),(h),(l), or (q)[(p) in 1988] by any person with respect to fuel used * * * during his taxable year; * * *6
Section 6427(i) does not refer to any claims filed under subsection (k). Section 6427(k) makes the following reference to an income tax credit in lieu of payment:
SEC. 6427(k). Income Tax Credit in Lieu of Payment.--
* * * * * * *
(3) Allowance of credit against income tax.--
For allowances of credit against the income tax imposed by subtitle A for fuel used or resold by the purchaser, see section 34.
B. Section 34
Section 34 allows a credit against income tax impоsed under subtitle A for the taxable year equal to the sum of the amounts payable to the taxpayer under section 6427. See
However, credit is not allowed under
C. Analysis
The Court of Federal Claims has recently held that the “one claim” rule under
Section 34(a)(3) provides: “There shall be allowed as a credit * * * an amount equal to the sum of the amounts payable to the taxpayer * * * under section 6427“. The text of
Respondent argues that
The legislative history of the Airport and Airway Revenue Act of 1970, Pub. L. 91-258, sec. 207, 84 Stat. 246, which added section 6427 to the Code, supports our view that sections 34 and 6427 are parallel authorities. Section 207(a) of that act added section 6427 to the Code, while section 207(c) of the act, 84 Stat. 248, amended the existing section 39 (which is now sectiоn 34) by adding the language now found in
The text of the conference report provides, in part, as follows:
This amendment provides procedures for the payment of amounts (under a new section 6427 of the Code) or for the crediting against income tax
(under the existing section 39 of the Code) in the case of the retailers excise taxes on gasoline and special fuels. * * * The amendment also provides that, in general, thе time for filing claims for credit under section 39, and the time for filing full-year claims by government bodies or exempt organizations for excise tax payments under specified sections of the Code, will be comparable to the time in which claim for credit or refund of income taxes may be filed.
The House recedes with technical changes. [Conf. Rept. 91-1074, at 51 (1970), 1970-1 C.B. 401, 407.]
The conference report speaks of “procedurеs” to be made available, in a parallel structure of relief by “payment” (
The Senate report confirms our conclusion that sections 39 and 6427 were viewed by Congress as parallel authorities. The Senate report provides the following discussion rеgarding the different treatments of credits against income tax and payments under the excise tax provisions:
Under the committee amendments, credits against income tax for gasoline, diesel fuels, special fuеls, or lubricating oil tax (sec. 39) are to give rise to interest on overpayments as in the case of other income tax credits. On the other hand, payments under the excise tax provisions (secs. 6420, 6421, 6424, and 6427) for the gasoline, diesel fuels, special fuels, or lubricating oil taxes, as the case generally with regard to excise taxes (and as under present law), are made without interest being paid to the taxpayer. [S. Rept. 91-706, at 23 (1970), 1970-1 C.B. 386, 399.]
The Senate report does not suggest that the credits available under section 39 were created or limited by section 6427. The Senate report also notes the extension of the time within which a section 6427 claim may be made “will make the filing of full-year claims (but not the quarterly claims) for refunds (under secs. * * * 6427) similar to the new rule for claims for credits against income tax (under sec. 39).” S. Rept. 91-706, supra at 23, 1970-1 C.B. at 399. Thus, the relief afforded by sections 39 and 6427 appears to have been intended to be equal in authority and effect.
III. Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, we deny respondent‘s motion for partial summary judgment, and we hold that petitioner is not barred by the so-called “one claim” rule of section
An appropriate order will be issued denying respondent‘s motion for partial summary judgment.
