History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fox v. State
608 So. 2d 132
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1992
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Because the appellant’s sole point on the merits presents only harmless error, State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986), the convictions under review are affirmed. The cause is remanded for resentencing within the appropriate cell without including legal constraint points under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701 d. 6. The fact that the defendant was on felony bond when the offenses were committed does not permit such an assessment. Brown v. State, 569 So.2d 1223 (Fla.1990); Mosely v. State, 543 So.2d 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Mize v. State, 495 So.2d 845 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Case Details

Case Name: Fox v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Nov 10, 1992
Citation: 608 So. 2d 132
Docket Number: No. 92-835
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.