History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fox v. Smith
3 Cow. 23
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1824
Check Treatment
Woodworth, J.

Conceding that the Judge may order the jury polled, seems to give the party a right to insist on it. I think this cannot be a matter of mere discretion. It has been the uniform practice at the Circuit, as far as I have been acquainted with it, to allow the jury to be polled, whether the verdict he sealed, as here, by consent, or delivered ore tenus by the foreman.

Curia.

We think the jury may be palled, at the instance

©f either party, at' any time before the verdict is recorded* whether it be sealed, by consent, or is oral.

Motion granted.

Case Details

Case Name: Fox v. Smith
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 15, 1824
Citation: 3 Cow. 23
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.