Fox v. Armour Packing Co.
121 Ga. 273 | Ga. | 1904
It affirmatively appearing'that the only plea filed by the defendant was one to the jurisdiction of the court, and that the evidence of the witness on account of whose absence a continuance was asked, if given as claimed, would have gone to the merits of the case, and would in no sense have supported the plea filed, it was not error to refuse to continue the case on account of the absence of such witness.
Judgment affirmed.
