History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fowler v. Hait
10 Johns. 111
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1813
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The defendant having omitted to plead, or give notice of the former trial and judgment, was precluded from giving evidence of it, at the trial. It would produce surprise on the part of the plaintiff and injustice, if the defendant were allowed to set up, at the trial, special matter in bar, of which no notice had been previously given to the plaintiff The judgment musíbe affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.(a)

See Waring v, Lockwood, ante, p. 108.

Case Details

Case Name: Fowler v. Hait
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 15, 1813
Citation: 10 Johns. 111
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.