History
  • No items yet
midpage
854 F.3d 1045
9th Cir.
2016

ORDER

Plaintiffs in the case appeal a district court’s order dismissing claims that a Cali fornia law violates the Bill of Attainder Clause, U.S. Const, art. I, § 10, cl. 1 (the “bill of attainder claim”), and the Equal Protection Clause, U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1 (the “equal protection claim”). We conclude that the district court correctly dismissed the bill of attainder claim, but erroneously dismissed the equal protection claim. We therefore AFFIRM in part and REVERSE in part, and REMAND the case to the district court for further proceedings with respect to the equal protection claim only. A written opinion giving the court’s reasoning will follow in due course.

The time for filing any petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc shall be extended and shall not begin to run until the court has filed its written opinion giving its reasoning.

Case Details

Case Name: Fowler Packing Co. v. Lanier
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 9, 2016
Citations: 854 F.3d 1045; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 21961; 2016 WL 7176665; No. 16-16236
Docket Number: No. 16-16236
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Fowler Packing Co. v. Lanier, 854 F.3d 1045