50 Mich. 15 | Mich. | 1883
This ease appears to have been tried upon ■the merits, and no objection seems to have been made to the form of remedy. Under the finding of facts, the judgment rendered was correct, and as the city has not therefore been injured we are not inclined to consider the question raised for the first time in this Court.
The plaintiff was by the board of public works of the city ■of Jackson appointed superintendent. The charter pro
Neither under the charter of 1875 nor the amendment of 1877, (Local Acts, 1877, p. 474) did the council have power to fix plaintiff’s salary. It was and remained for the board of public works so to do, subject to the approval of the council. '
It follows that the judgment must be affirmed with costs.