History
  • No items yet
midpage
Foster v. Eastern Trust & Banking Co.
88 A. 474
Me.
1913
Check Treatment

On motion to set aside a verdict of a jury. The evidence was conflicting. Although we might have decided the question of fact differently from the way the jury did, we cannot say that the jury were not warranted in believing the plaintiff’s version, and in returning a verdict for him. Motion for a new trial overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Foster v. Eastern Trust & Banking Co.
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Oct 11, 1913
Citation: 88 A. 474
Court Abbreviation: Me.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.