OPINION
Donald Foster appeals the district court’s summary judgment order affirming the Bankruptcy Court’s ruling permitting the Ventura County District Attorney to collect post-petition interest on Foster’s child support arrearages after the claim was paid in full and his Chapter 13 case had been closed. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We note that Foster’s brief fails to comply with Rule 28(a) of the Fedеral Rules of Appellate Procedure, which requires specific information in appropriate sections and in thе order indicated.
I. Background
Foster filed a Chapter 13 bаnkruptcy petition in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California in 1995. Among his unsecured claims entitled to priority, Foster listed a child support debt owed to the Ventura County District Attorney (“the County”). The County filed a proof of claim for $8,918.78. Foster propоsed to pay the debt in full over a 36 month term and later received approval to extend the repayment term to 50 mоnths. The County did not oppose Foster’s Chapter 13 plan and did not specifically request post-petition interest on the сhild support debt.
On January 31, 2000, the court granted Foster a discharge of his debts, and his case was closed. On February 2, 2000, the County sent a wаge assignment to Foster’s employer, requiring the employer to withhold $100.00 per month to pay $2,006.75 of interest that accrued on the child support arrearages after Foster filed his original bankruptcy petition.
Foster filed a motion to enforce the discharge injunction against the County and stay the wage assignment. He also filed a complaint to determine discharge-ability оf the post-petition interest.
The bankruptcy court granted summary judgment in the County’s favor, and the district court affirmed. We review de novo the district court’s conclusions of law in a decision on appeal from the bankruptcy court. In re Cardelucci,
II. Discussion
We have held that post-petition interest on nondischargeable tax debts is also nondischargeable and may be recovered personally against a debtor who has received a discharge on the underlying debt in Chapter 11 and 12 bankruptcies. In re Artisan Woodworkers,
By code, a claim for post-petition interest, e.g., post-petition interest on child support obligations, is not pаrt of the bankruptcy estate because such “unmatured” interest was not part of the debt as of the date of the petition. 11 U.S.C. § 502(b)(2); Artisan Woodworkers,
We agree with the weight of authority, including our own Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, that interest on nondischargeable child support obligations, like interest on nondischargeable tax debt, continues to accrue after a Chapter 13 petition is filed and is not dischargeable. In re Foross,
Several other jurisdictions have also concluded such obligations survive discharge of thе underlying debt. In re Jacobson,
These decisions rely on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bruning v. United States,
[O]ne would assume that Congress, in providing that a certain type of debt should survive bankruptcy proceedings as а personal liability of the debtor, intended personal liability to continue as to the interest on that debt as well as to its principal amount .... In most situations, interest is considered to be the cost of the use of the amounts owing a creditor and an incentive to prompt repayment and, thus, an integral part of a continuing debt.... [Ljogic and reason indicate that post-petition interest on a tax claim excepted from discharge ... should be recoverable in a later action against the debtor personally, and there is no evidence of any congressional intent to the contrary.
Id. at 360,
We conclude that рost-petition interest, as an integral part of the nondischargeable child support obligation, is also nondis-chargeаble and may be collected personally against the debtor after the underlying debt is discharged. The district court’s grant of summary judgmеnt in favor of the County is AFFIRMED.
Notes
. Foster's brief fails to include a table of contents with page references (Rule 28(a)(2)), a table of authorities (Rule 28(a)(3)), a jurisdictional statement (Rule 28(a)(4)), a summary of the argument (Rule 28(a)(8)), cites to the record in the argument (Rule 28(a)(9)(A)), and a short conclusion stating the precise relief sought (Rule 2 8 (a) (10)).