Foster v. Berg
143 N.W. 355
Minn.
1913
Check Treatment
Dibell, C.

The plaintiff, the holder of a tax certificate, brought this action under R. L. 1905, § 972, to quiet title. The court found that the plaintiff’s tax title was invalid; that the defendant was the owner in fee; and it gave the plaintiff a lien pursuant to the provisions of said *181section. The plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The validity of his tax title is the only question.

1. Section 908, R. L. 1905, requires a certified copy of the resolution designating the newspaper for the publication of the delinquent list to be filed with the clerk of the district court. It has always been held that the designation of the newspaper is a jurisdictional requirement. Eastman v. Linn, 26 Minn. 215, 2 N. W. 693. In Merriman v. Knight, 43 Minn. 493, 45 N. W. 1098, where a. resolution was adopted but a certified copy was not filed, it was said that the filing was a prerequisite to the publication of the list. In State v. Crosley Park Land Co. 63 Minn. 205, 65 N. W. 268, and in Foster v. Brick, 121 Minn. 173, 141 N. W. 101, the latter case involving the filing of the same certified copy as is here involved, it was assumed that the certified copy should be filed prior to the publication of the delinquent list.

In the case before us the resolution was adopted at the Jaunary, 1908, meeting of the county board. The delinquent list was published on February 14 and February 21. The certified copy was filed on February 25. Judgment was entered on March 13. The precise question now presented has never been decided. We now hold that the statute intends the filing of the certified copy prior to the first publication of the delinquent list; that such filing is jurisdictional ; and that without such filing there is no valid judgment.

2. Section 914, R. L. 1905, provides that jurisdiction shall not be affected by certain irregularities, mistakes and errors, nor by any mistake “in the designation of the newspaper wherein such list is published.” This statute renders certain irregularities, errors and mistakes harmless; but it does not cure jurisdictional defects. Foster v. Gage, 117 Minn. 499, 136 N. W. 299. It does not give validity to the plaintiff’s tax title.

Order affirmed.