Fortune v. NH Department of SafetyFortune v. NH Department of Safety
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc dated July 14, 2026, for the reasons set forth therein. Defendant’s Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied. “[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate‘s report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.” Rivera-Aponte v. Gomez Bus Line, Inc., 62 F.4th 1, 10 (1st Cir. 2023) (quoting Sch. Union No. 37 v. United Nat‘l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010)); see also Santos-Santos v. Torres-Centeno, 842 F.3d 163, 168 (1st Cir. 2016) (“[P]arties who fail to file objections to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation lose their right to appellate review.“).
So Ordered.
Steven J. McAuliffe
United States District Judge
Date: August 5, 2026
cc: William E. Fortune, pro se