History
  • No items yet
midpage
Forsythe v. Norcross
5 Watts 432
Pa.
1836
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

An entry on a card or a slate, is but a memorandum preparatory to permanent evidence of the transaction, which must be perfected at or near the time, and in the routine of the business. But the routine must be a reasonable one; for there is nothing in the condition of a craftsman to call for indulgence till his slate be full, or till it be convenient for him to dispose of the â– contents of it. In Ingraham v. Bockius, 9 Serg. & Rawle 285, and Patton v. Ryan, 4 Rawle 410, the entries were transferred the same evening or the next morning; and they ought in every instance to *433be so in the course of the succeeding day. In Vicary v. Moore, 2 Watts 458, entries transferred from scraps of paper carried about in the pocket during one or more days, were held to be inadmissible; and on this principle, the book was, in the present instance, incompetent.

Judgment reversed, and a venire de novo awarded.

Case Details

Case Name: Forsythe v. Norcross
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 15, 1836
Citation: 5 Watts 432
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.