History
  • No items yet
midpage
Forsyth v. Prentis
12 N.W. 199
Mich.
1882
Check Treatment
Cooley, J.

The legal questions raised by the record in this case are of no general importance, and could not be understood without a full statement of the facts as they were developed on the trial, and of the opposing theories of the parties in respect to them. Their discussion would, therefore, be without value. We have been unable to discover any ruling or any instruction by the trial judge which appears to us clearly erroneous, or any failure to submit the ease fairly to the jury.

The judgment must therefore be affirmed with costs.

Campbell and Marston, JJ. concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Forsyth v. Prentis
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 25, 1882
Citation: 12 N.W. 199
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.