History
  • No items yet
midpage
Forney v. Engineering News Publishing Co.
10 N.Y.S. 814
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1890
Check Treatment
Van Brunt, P. J.

It does not seem necessary to discuss at large the questions presented upon this appeal. The facts are distinctly stated in the opinion of the court below, and the grounds upon which the relief should be refused to the plaintiff are there correctly set forth. The cases of Stokes v. Allen, 9 N. Y. Supp. 846, (decided at the May term of this court,) and Richardson v. Richardson, 8 N. Y. Supp. 52, also serve to illustrate the correctness, of the conclusions arrived at. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Forney v. Engineering News Publishing Co.
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 26, 1890
Citation: 10 N.Y.S. 814
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.