| Ill. App. Ct. | Dec 11, 1890
It does not appear from the bill of exceptions that any motion for a new trial was made in this case, or that any exception was taken to any action of the court in overruling such motion, if any was made.
A motion for a new trial is not a part of the record, nor are exceptions taken to the action of the court upon the same. Such motion and exceptions must be made a part of the record by a bill of exceptions or we can not take notice thereof.
The minute made by the clerk of the motion for a new trial and exception to the action of the court thereon are no part of the record. Obermark v. The People, 24 Ill. App. 259" date_filed="1887-10-05" court="Ill. App. Ct." case_name="Obermark v. People">24 Ill. App. 259; C. & N. W. R. R. Co. v. Benham, 25 Ill. App. 248" date_filed="1888-01-18" court="Ill. App. Ct." case_name="Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Benham">25 Ill. App. 248; Shedd v. Dalzell, 30 Ill. App. 356" date_filed="1889-03-13" court="Ill. App. Ct." case_name="Shedd v. Dalzell">30 Ill. App. 356; Daniels v. Shields, 38 Ill. 197" date_filed="1865-04-15" court="Ill." case_name="Daniels v. Shields">38 Ill. 197; Gill v. The People, 42 Ill. 321" date_filed="1866-11-15" court="Ill." case_name="Gill v. People">42 Ill. 321; Graham v. The People, 115 Ill. 566" date_filed="1886-01-25" court="Ill." case_name="Graham v. People">115 Ill. 566-569; James v. Dexter, 113 Ill. 654" date_filed="1885-05-15" court="Ill." case_name="James v. Dexter">113 Ill. 654; Martin v. Foulke, 114 Ill. 206" date_filed="1885-05-15" court="Ill." case_name="Martin v. Foulke">114 Ill. 206.
There is nothing in this record upon which we can set aside the action of the court, and its judgment is therefore affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.