68 Ohio St. 3d 473
Ohio
1994

Lead Opinion

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court on authority of Hyde v. Reynoldsville Casket Co. (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 240, 626 N.E.2d 75.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., concurs separately.



Concurrence Opinion

Moyer, C.J.,

concurring separately. I concur separately in the judgment entry in the above-styled case. As stated in Justice Wright’s dissent in Hyde v. Reynoldsville Casket Co. (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 240, 246-250, 626 N.E.2d 75, 79-81, I do not agree with the law announced in the majority decision. Nevertheless, it is the law on the issue in the above-styled case. As I believe all parties should receive equal application of the law announced by this court, and only for that reason, I concur in the judgment entry.





Dissenting Opinion

Wright, J.,

dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Hyde v. Reynoldsville Casket Co. (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 240, 246-250, 626 N.E.2d 75, 79-81.