History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ford v. Ford
193 Pa. 530
Pa.
1899
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

Our consideration of tbe pleadings and proofs in this case has satisfied us that there is no error in the learned trial judge’s findings of fact or conclusions of law that requires a reversal or modification of the decree. His findings of 'fact are fully warranted by the evidence, and the conclusions drawn from the facts thus established appear to be correct. There is nothing in either of the nineteen specifications of error that requires discussion.

On the facts found by the learned trial judge, and for reasons given in his opinion, we affirm the decree and dismiss the appeal at appellant’s costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Ford v. Ford
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Nov 6, 1899
Citation: 193 Pa. 530
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 127
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.