History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ford v. Fargason
51 S.E. 318
Ga.
1905
Check Treatment
Lumpkin, J.

There being no error of law complained of, the evidence being sufficient to sustain the verdict, and the presiding judge having refused a new trial, this court will not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Simmons, C. J., absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Ford v. Fargason
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 14, 1905
Citation: 51 S.E. 318
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.