Ford Motor Company v. TodecheeneFord Motor Company v. Todecheene
Edward D. Fitzhugh, Law Offices of Edward D. Fitzhugh, Tempe, AZ, for Joe R. Todecheene and Mary Todecheene.
Marcelino Rodolfo Gomez, Luraline D. Tapahe, Navajo Nation Department of Justice, Window Rock, AZ, for Navajo Nation District Court.
Before: BARRY G. SILVERMAN, W. FLETCHER, and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
AMENDED ORDER
The order filed February 1, 2007, is hereby amended. The entire text shall be replaced with the following text.
Joe and Mary Todecheene’s Petition for Rehearing is GRANTED in part.
The opinion in this case, Ford Motor Company v. Todecheene, 394 F.3d 1170 (9th Cir.2005) is WITHDRAWN.
The tribal court did not “plainly” lack jurisdiction under the second exception, recognized in Montana v. United States, 450 U.S. 544, 565, 101 S.Ct. 1245, 67 L.Ed.2d 493 (1981), to the general rule that tribes do not have jurisdiction over non-members. See Boozer v. Wilder, 381 F.3d 931, 935 (9th Cir.2004) (requiring exhaustion unless the tribal courts plainly
The petitions for rehearing en banc filed by Joe and Mary Todecheene and the Navajo Nation are DENIED as moot, and the petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc filed by Ford Motor Company are DENIED.