History
  • No items yet
midpage
Follender v. Merl
242 A.D. 650
N.Y. App. Div.
1934
Check Treatment

Judgment and order reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. While plaintiff’s arrest was illegal, the appellants were not responsible for it. (Vittorio v. St. Regis Paper Co., 239 N. Y. 148.) While the issuance of the warrant was sufficient to form a basis for the action for malicious prosecution (Halberstadt v. New York Life Ins. Co., 194 N. Y. 1), it clearly appears from the evidence that the criminal proceeding was terminated by agreement of the parties prior to the commencement of this action, and for this reason the action for malicious prosecution will not lie. Young, Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Follender v. Merl
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 15, 1934
Citation: 242 A.D. 650
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.