History
  • No items yet
midpage
Foley v. Equitable Investment Co.
267 Pa. 514
Pa.
1920
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

Frederick M. Jackson, John Waldron and Orton W. Albee, while transacting business as partners, bor*516rowed moneys from P. T. Foley, the appellee, to whom they paid usurious rates of interest. The partnership became the appellant corporation, which gave its obligations to the appellee for his claims against the partnership and for loans made to itself. He entered judgment against it on a judgment note which it had given to cover its obligations to him, and the same was opened to allow proof of the payments of usurious interest as set-offs. On the trial of the issue, without a jury, to determine the amount due on the judgment, the defendant claimed credits for usurious interest paid, not only by it, but by the partnership. The court refused to allow any set-off for such interest paid by the partnership, and this was undoubtedly correct: Little’s Estate, 244 Pa. 368.

The complaint of the appellant is dismissed and the judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Foley v. Equitable Investment Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 26, 1920
Citation: 267 Pa. 514
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 250
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.