History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fluckers v. State
785 So. 2d 665
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2001
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

No reversible error has been demonstrated in any of the trial rulings challenged on this appeal. See Goodwin v. State, 751 So.2d 537 (Fla.1999). As to the only sentencing point raised, we follow Alfonso v. State, 761 So.2d 1231 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), review dismissed, 767 So.2d 453 (Fla.2000), both in concluding that an enhanced conviction and sentence under section 784.07, Florida Statutes (1997) may properly be made the basis of a habitual violent felony offender sentence and that this holding is in hereby-certified-direct conflict with Oliveira v. State, 751 So.2d 611 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), review denied, 770 So.2d 161 (Fla.2000).

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Fluckers v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 9, 2001
Citation: 785 So. 2d 665
Docket Number: No. 3D00-901
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.