History
  • No items yet
midpage
Flowserve Corp. v. Bonilla
952 So. 2d 1239
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2007
|
Check Treatment
952 So. 2d 1239 (2007)

FLOWSERVE CORP. (f/k/a Durametallic, Inc.), Petitioner,
v.
Thomas J. BONILLA, et al., Respondents.

No. 3D06-2201.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 4, 2007.

Hawkins & Parnell (Atlanta) and Evelyn M. Fletcher, Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell and John H. Pelzer, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

James L. Ferraro and David A. Jagolinzer and Case A. Dam, Miami, for respondents.

Ullman, Bursa, Hoffman & Regano and Daniel S. Green; Fowler, White, Boggs & Banker and Tracy Raffles Gunn, Tampa, for the Florida Defense Lawyers Association as amicus curiae.

Shook, Hardy & Bacon and Frank Cruz-Alvarez for the Associated Industries of Florida as Amicus curiae.

Before COPE, C.J., and WELLS and LAGOA, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Flowserve Corporation petitions for a writ of certiorari to quash an order of the trial court holding the Asbestos and Silica Compensation Fairness Act, §§ 744.201-209, Fla. Stat. (2005), to be unconstitutional *1240 when applied retroactively to respondents' pending asbestosis claims. The respondents' lawsuit was already pending on the July 1, 2005, effective date of the Act.

We grant the petition for certiorari and quash the order on the authority of DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Hurst, 949 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 3d DCA, 2007).

Petition for certiorari granted.

Case Details

Case Name: Flowserve Corp. v. Bonilla
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Apr 4, 2007
Citation: 952 So. 2d 1239
Docket Number: 3D06-2201
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.