History
  • No items yet
midpage
Flowers v. State
54 S.E. 811
Ga.
1906
Check Treatment
XiUMPKlsr, J.

No error of law was complained of. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and the trial judge did not err -in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Flowers v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 30, 1906
Citation: 54 S.E. 811
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.