Florida Parole Commission v. CrinerFlorida Parole Commission v. Criner
The Florida Parole Commission seeks review of an order granting Criner’s petition for writ of mandamus. We affirm that portion of the order concluding that the Commission erred in determining Criner’s salient factor score, and directing that his presumptive parole release date be recalculated accordingly. However, we reverse that portion
The entitlement to mandamus relief is dependent upon the showing of clear legal right on the part of the petitioner, and an indisputable legal duty of the part of the respondent. Mandamus may not be used to establish the existence of an enforceable right, but rather only to enforce a right already clearly and certainly established by law. Florida League of Cities v. Smith,
Moreover, even assuming mandamus was available to establish the entitlement to an enforceable right, we are not persuaded that Criner’s position is correct. In finding otherwise, the trial court concluded that in view of decisions holding that imposition of the death penalty for the crime of rape violates the constitutional prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment,
In State v. Hogan,
We are likewise unpersuaded by Criner’s suggestion that he is entitled to have this crime classified as a life felony because, for reasons not clear from the record, judgment and sentence were reimposed in 1981, by which time the crime he committed could no longer lawfully be the subject of the death penalty. See, Castle v. State,
For the reasons expressed herein, the order granting mandamus relief is AFFIRMED IN PART, and REVERSED IN PART.
Notes
. At the time of commission, Criner’s offense was classified as a capital felony pursuant to § 794.01 (Fla.Stat.1965). Criner was sentenced to a term of life imprisonment.
. Furman v. Georgia,